Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Garry Perkins's avatar

In a world of social welfare, you are giving terrible advice. What good would have come from a junky having a child? Do you want to see how that worked out? We need to probably evolve past birth control. That means many of us not having children. The future will have less humans, and that is not terrible, unless you fear your culture will die out (see Italy, Germany).

I see where you are coming from, and drugs can destroy lives, but no good comes from poorly-planned families. It is better to have a consolidation generation or three where assets concentrate down. So long as we can defend our borders, an America with 200m will not be appreciably worse than an American with 330m. I think we can all agree that a China or an India will less people will likely lead to better lives and improving environmental conditions. I would love to see a Europe with re-wilded forests, along with an expanding Amazon basin and less filth being pumped into the sky. Collapsing populations are terrifying, but slow reductions might be exactly what earth needs. Furthermore, less misery from better parents might be exactly what humanity needs.

Expand full comment
Alex's avatar

o7

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts